[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55015D38.5060100@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:32:40 +0100
From: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Giedrius Statkevičius
<giedrius.statkevicius@...il.com>
CC: Lidza Louina <lidza.louina@...il.com>,
Mark Hounschell <markh@...pro.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Staging: dgnc: Use goto for error handling
On 12/03/2015 10:27, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:37:30PM +0200, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
>> It's still not in staging-testing for some reason :(
>>
> It can take several weeks to get merged. Relax.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
What should i do concerning that ?
I need to send a second version of this patch anyway to fix the
fact that i inverted 2 statements, namely:
+exit_unlock:
+ if (ld)
+ tty_ldisc_deref(ld);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
should be
+exit_unlock:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
+ if (ld)
+ tty_ldisc_deref(ld);
Should I wait these several weeks to send the second version or should
I send a second version fixing this issue a wait for someone to ask me
to solve the conflict ?
Quentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists