lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAtXAHd_imahuXFnGJY7JwpN+zRFG_pvGQbPN+O_u1VAruk8ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:52:00 -0700
From:	Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: reset: Add generic SYSCON register mapped poweroff.

Paul,

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:

> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() is defined only in include/linux/module.h. The few
> related lines read (in next-20150311):
>     #ifdef MODULE
>     /* Creates an alias so file2alias.c can find device table. */
>     #define MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(type, name)                                     \
>     extern const typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table             \
>       __attribute__ ((unused, alias(__stringify(name))))
>     #else  /* !MODULE */
>     #define MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(type, name)
>     #endif
>
> So I think MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() is always preprocessed away for boolean
> code. Did I get that right?

Yeah, looking at that convinced me :) I have it already removed in v2.
>
>> >> +module_platform_driver(syscon_poweroff_driver);
>> >
>> > I think the built-in equivalent of this would be adding a wrapper that
>> > only does
>> >     platform_driver_register(&syscon_poweroff_driver);
>>
>> I couldn't find other examples in the tree doing this. Any pointers?
>
> Please note "think". But see drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c:
>     static int __init dbx500_cpufreq_register(void)
>     {
>             return platform_driver_register(&dbx500_cpufreq_plat_driver);
>     }
>     device_initcall(dbx500_cpufreq_register);
>
> or drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:
>     static int __init gpio_vf610_init(void)
>     {
>             return platform_driver_register(&vf610_gpio_driver);
>     }
>     device_initcall(gpio_vf610_init);

I included it into v3. Thanks.

Thanks again for your feedback,

Moritz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ