linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] n_tty: use kmalloc() instead of vmalloc() to avoid crash on armada-xp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55018E8B.8060704@list.ru>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:03:07 +0300
From:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
To:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Gregory Clément 
	<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] n_tty: use kmalloc() instead of vmalloc() to avoid crash
 on armada-xp

12.03.2015 15:47, Thomas Petazzoni пишет:
> Dear Stas Sergeev,
>
>
>> The only problem I now have is the lack of 256Mb of
>> ram.
>>
>> [    0.000000] MEMBLOCK
>> configuration:                                         
>> [    0.000000]  memory size = 0x1f0000000 reserved size =
>> 0x70d6e3             
>> [    0.000000]  memory.cnt  =
>> 0x2                                              
>> [    0.000000]  memory[0x0]     [0x00000000000000-0x000000efffffff],
>> 0xf0000000
>> bytes flags:
>> 0x0                                                               
>> [    0.000000]  memory[0x1]     [0x00000100000000-0x000001ffffffff],
>> 0x100000000
>>  bytes flags: 0x0 
>>
>> There is a 8Gb in a single dimm.
>> Do you have any idea why 0xf0000000-0xffffffff range is missing?
>> I suspect this is something with uboot too.
> No, this is expected. Your physical address space is shared between RAM
> and I/O devices. So the space 0xf0000000 -> 0xffffffff in the physical
> address space is where all the registers for your SoC and PCIe devices
Yeah, I realize that, but I was hoping that some work-around
exists. For example, move entire dimm above 4G? Is this really
impossible? Or maybe move overlapping region above 8G...

> will be located. You are therefore indeed losing 256 MB of RAM, but
> there's nothing that can be done about this.
OK, that's sad.
Thanks for info!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/