[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55019229.5050500@atmel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:18:33 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] ARM: at91: add soc detection infrastructure
Le 11/03/2015 18:00, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Add new structures and functions to handle AT91 SoC detection.
>
> [alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com: reworked DBGU detection]
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index e7ce6612bc42..f6c5b05e8de8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91
> select IRQ_DOMAIN
> select PINCTRL
> select PINCTRL_AT91
> + select SOC_BUS
> select USE_OF
> help
> This enables support for systems based on Atmel
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> index 827fdbcce1c7..44a5c1a92b39 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> # Makefile for the linux kernel.
> #
>
> -obj-y := setup.o
> +obj-y := setup.o soc.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_AT91SAM9) += sam9_smc.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..332698dbf572
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Atmel
> + *
> + * Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com
> + * Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "AT91: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +
> +#include "soc.h"
> +
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR 0x40
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_ARCH(x) (((x) >> 20) & 0xff)
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(x) ((x) & 0x1f)
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT BIT(31)
> +#define AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK 0x7fffffe0
> +#define AT91_DBGU_EXID 0x44
> +
> +struct soc_device * __init at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc_family *families)
> +{
> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
> + const struct at91_soc_family *family;
> + const struct at91_soc *soc;
> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
> + struct device_node *np;
> + void __iomem *regs;
> + u32 cidr, exid;
> +
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "atmel,at91rm9200-dbgu");
> + if (!np)
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
> + "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu");
> +
> + if (!np) {
> + pr_warn("Could not find DBGU node");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + of_node_put(np);
> +
> + if (!regs) {
> + pr_warn("Could not map DBGU iomem range");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + cidr = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_CIDR);
> + exid = readl(regs + AT91_DBGU_EXID);
> +
> + iounmap(regs);
> +
> + for (family = families; family->name; family++) {
> + if (family->id == AT91_DBGU_CIDR_ARCH(cidr))
Well, I wouldn't use this field as a "family" differentiator.
For SoC which are part of a family, if there is one, we usually have a
more precise distinction than at91sam9/sama5/sam9xe.
The families are a group of SoCs that share the same IPs and same design
(usually the same die as well...).
So, can you please re-spin the series and remove this notion: only keep
type as family and sub-type as SoC (you can even use these words for the
comment (see below)).
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!family->name) {
> + pr_warn("Could not find matching SoC family\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + for (soc = family->socs; soc->name; soc++) {
> + if (soc->cidr_match != (cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_MATCH_MASK))
> + continue;
> +
> + if (!(cidr & AT91_DBGU_CIDR_EXT) || soc->exid_match == exid)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (!soc->name) {
> + pr_warn("Could not find matching SoC description\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!soc_dev_attr)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + soc_dev_attr->family = family->name;
> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc->subname ? soc->subname : soc->name;
> + soc_dev_attr->revision = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%X",
> + AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
> + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
> + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr->revision);
> + kfree(soc_dev_attr);
> + pr_warn("Could not register SoC device\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + pr_info("Detected soc type: %s, revision %X\n", soc->name,
Well, we can have a more appropriated wording:
s/soc type/SoC family/
> + AT91_DBGU_CIDR_VERSION(cidr));
> + if (soc->subname)
> + pr_info("Detected soc subtype: %s\n", soc->subname);
s/soc subtype/SoC/
> +
> + return soc_dev;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..66dcd146601a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/soc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2015 Atmel
> + *
> + * Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com
> + *
> + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __AT91_SOC_H
> +#define __AT91_SOC_H
> +
> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
> +
> +struct at91_soc {
> + u32 cidr_match;
> + u32 exid_match;
> + const char *name;
> + const char *subname;
> +};
> +
> +struct at91_soc_family {
> + int id;
> + const char *name;
> + const struct at91_soc *socs;
> +};
> +
> +#define AT91_SOC(__cidr, __exid, __name, __subname) \
> + { \
> + .cidr_match = (__cidr), \
> + .exid_match = (__exid), \
> + .name = (__name), \
> + .subname = (__subname), \
> + }
> +
> +#define AT91_SOC_FAMILY(__id, __name, __socs) \
> + { \
> + .id = (__id), \
> + .name = (__name), \
> + .socs = (__socs), \
> + }
> +
> +struct soc_device * __init
> +at91_soc_init(const struct at91_soc_family *families);
> +
> +#endif /* __AT91_SOC_H */
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists