[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLVNmzZhR6NaA-F8OjA__OK=i2zPtnPka4+qW4qcwN_8qA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:26:07 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Increased clocksource validation and cleanups (v4)
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> * John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
>> New in v4:
>> * Lots and lots of typo corrections and minor cleanups suggested
>> by Ingo.
>> * Dropped "Remove clocksource_max_deferment()" patch
>> * Added "Rename __clocksource_updatefreq_*..." patch
>> * I realized one of the patches (Improve clocksource watchdog
>> reporting) didn't have a proper cc list, so while it was on lkml
>> folks may not have reviewed it before.
>
> So I've applied them with some changes to tip:timers/core, please look
> at the commit notifications for details. Any outstanding review
> feedback can be addressed as delta patches on top of this I think,
> none of my observations were show-stoppers.
Have you not yet pushed the changed out publicly? (I'm only seeing one
change from Viresh in tip/timers/core)
Once its available I'll review your changes and try to integrate any
remaining issues you pointed out with additional patches.
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists