[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1426178426.30327.117.camel@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:40:26 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
CC: <trivial@...nel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"USB list" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] usb: gadget: serial: %pF is only for function
pointers
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 12:51 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:13 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com> wrote:
> > Use %pS for actual addresses, otherwise you'll get bad output
> > on arches like ppc64 where %pF expects a function descriptor.
>
> From Documentation/printk-formats.txt:
>
> "On ia64, ppc64 and parisc64 architectures function pointers are
> actually function descriptors which must first be resolved. The 'F' and
> 'f' specifiers perform this resolution and then provide the same
> functionality as the 'S' and 's' specifiers."
>
> ,so current code should work fine on ppc64, right?
No. __builtin_return_address() returns a pointer to an instruction, not
a function pointer descriptor. If you use %pF on the former, it'll
print instruction opcodes as if they were the address.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists