[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150312021609.GA3508@swordfish>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:16:09 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] new zram statistics reporting scheme
On (03/12/15 10:55), Minchan Kim wrote:
> I really appreciate you enhance stat functions, esp, working with iostat!
thanks! my pleasure.
> One thing I want to discuss is sometime we could remove RO fields
> in /sys/block/zram/ but we couldn't remove RW fields because
> io_stat/mm_stat doesn't have any writable option now so users will
> have two options to read stat. For exmaple,
I played with CONFIG_ZRAM_OLD_STATS option, which turns RW attrs into
WO attrs (where possible/needed). but it turned out to be a rather
ugly patch and I eventually decided that I don't want to have these
#ifdef-s in zram code for the next two years. so providing both RW/RO
old stats (with a warning in the logs) and RO [mm|io]_stat sound like
a better plan.
> cat /sys/block/zram/mem_used_max
> cat /sys/block/zram/mm_stat | awk friend
>
> How about changing only writeable, not readable for duplicated stats
> in /sys/block/zram? So, user will have writeable stat to set some
> options in /sys/block/zram and readable stat to get some data in
> /sys/block/zram/[io|mm]_stat if the stat is duplicated in both.
Sorry, I probably didn't drink enough coffee today, can you please
rephrase or give a trivial example?
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists