[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150312174213.GA18985@lerouge>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:42:14 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] uptime: Convert uptime to use 64bit time accessor
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:24:17AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> Convert the uptime output to use the timespec64 structure.
That looks correct but the changelog lacks a reason :-)
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
> ---
> fs/proc/uptime.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/uptime.c b/fs/proc/uptime.c
> index 33de567..a0b262f 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/uptime.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/uptime.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>
> static int uptime_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> - struct timespec uptime;
> + struct timespec64 uptime;
> struct timespec idle;
> u64 idletime;
> u64 nsec;
> @@ -20,12 +20,12 @@ static int uptime_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> idletime += (__force u64) kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE];
>
> - get_monotonic_boottime(&uptime);
> + get_monotonic_boottime64(&uptime);
> nsec = cputime64_to_jiffies64(idletime) * TICK_NSEC;
> idle.tv_sec = div_u64_rem(nsec, NSEC_PER_SEC, &rem);
> idle.tv_nsec = rem;
> - seq_printf(m, "%lu.%02lu %lu.%02lu\n",
> - (unsigned long) uptime.tv_sec,
> + seq_printf(m, "%llu.%02lu %lu.%02lu\n",
> + (unsigned long long) uptime.tv_sec,
> (uptime.tv_nsec / (NSEC_PER_SEC / 100)),
> (unsigned long) idle.tv_sec,
> (idle.tv_nsec / (NSEC_PER_SEC / 100)));
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists