[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150312.154756.1175332873553032640.davem@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:47:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: david@...olicited.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pablo@...filter.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: iptables problem upgrading kernel from 3.18.8 to 3.19.1
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 18:55:53 +0100
> David R <david@...olicited.net> wrote:
>
> [ CC Pablo & stable@ ]
>
>> I've just had an exception to my "uneventful kernel upgrade" monotony.
>>
>> My boot scripts failed when setting up the firewall due to this :-
>>
>> xt_recent: hitcount (1) is larger than packets to be remembered (1)
>> for table xxxx
>>
>> This is a completely straightforward
>>
>> iptables -A yyyy -j REJECT -p tcp --reject-with tcp-reset -m recent
>> --set --name xxxx --rsource
>>
>> Looking at the history for xt_recent.c it looks like this was introduced
>> in abc86d0f99242b7f142b7cb8f90e30081dd3c256 but maybe corrected in
>> cef9ed86ed62eeffcd017882278bbece32001f86 ?
>
> Right. I would recommend to revert abc86d0f99242b7f142b7cb8f90e30081dd3c256
> in 3.19.y series rather than applying cef9ed86ed62, though.
Greg, please queue up a revert of abc86d0f99242b7f142b7cb8f90e30081dd3c256 for
3.19.x -stable, if you haven't done so already.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists