[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150313082010.GA1033@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:20:10 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@...il.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
t-kristo@...com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v13 3/6] clk: Make clk API return per-user struct
clk instances
Hi Shawn,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:29:32AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> We did not add a DT property for it, because there was already enough
> info (clock configuration) in DT for kernel to figure it out.
Correct. My understanding is whatever can be figured out without DT should
be done that way.
Is there a way to get this clock-select bit set without
enable_fec_anatop_clock() in u-boot? Because this one selects the clock and
frequency and also sets the proper bit in gpr1. My question is simply why do
we need to do this here as well.
> Shawn
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists