lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2015 02:02:29 -0700
From:	tip-bot for John Stultz <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
	davej@...emonkey.org.uk, sboyd@...eaurora.org, hpa@...or.com,
	john.stultz@...aro.org, prarit@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:timers/core] timekeeping:
  Add checks to cap clocksource reads to the 'max_cycles' value

Commit-ID:  a558cd021d83b65c47ee5b9bec1fcfe5298a769f
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/a558cd021d83b65c47ee5b9bec1fcfe5298a769f
Author:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 21:16:33 -0700
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 08:07:04 +0100

timekeeping: Add checks to cap clocksource reads to the 'max_cycles' value

When calculating the current delta since the last tick, we
currently have no hard protections to prevent a multiplication
overflow from occuring.

This patch introduces infrastructure to allow a cap that
limits the clocksource read delta value to the 'max_cycles' value,
which is where an overflow would occur.

Since this is in the hotpath, it adds the extra checking under
CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING=y.

There was some concern that capping time like this could cause
problems as we may stop expiring timers, which could go circular
if the timer that triggers time accumulation were mis-scheduled
too far in the future, which would cause time to stop.

However, since the mult overflow would result in a smaller time
value, we would effectively have the same problem there.

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426133800-29329-6-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index acf0491..657414c 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ static void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset)
 	const char *name = tk->tkr.clock->name;
 
 	if (offset > max_cycles) {
-		printk_deferred("WARNING: timekeeping: Cycle offset (%lld) is larger than allowed by the '%s' clock's max_cycles value (%lld): time overflow\n",
+		printk_deferred("WARNING: timekeeping: Cycle offset (%lld) is larger than allowed by the '%s' clock's max_cycles value (%lld): time overflow danger\n",
 				offset, name, max_cycles);
-		printk_deferred("         timekeeping: Your kernel is sick, but tries to cope\n");
+		printk_deferred("         timekeeping: Your kernel is sick, but tries to cope by capping time updates\n");
 	} else {
 		if (offset > (max_cycles >> 1)) {
 			printk_deferred("INFO: timekeeping: Cycle offset (%lld) is larger than the the '%s' clock's 50%% safety margin (%lld)\n",
@@ -137,10 +137,39 @@ static void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset)
 		}
 	}
 }
+
+static inline cycle_t timekeeping_get_delta(struct tk_read_base *tkr)
+{
+	cycle_t cycle_now, delta;
+
+	/* read clocksource */
+	cycle_now = tkr->read(tkr->clock);
+
+	/* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time */
+	delta = clocksource_delta(cycle_now, tkr->cycle_last, tkr->mask);
+
+	/* Cap delta value to the max_cycles values to avoid mult overflows */
+	if (unlikely(delta > tkr->clock->max_cycles))
+		delta = tkr->clock->max_cycles;
+
+	return delta;
+}
 #else
 static inline void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset)
 {
 }
+static inline cycle_t timekeeping_get_delta(struct tk_read_base *tkr)
+{
+	cycle_t cycle_now, delta;
+
+	/* read clocksource */
+	cycle_now = tkr->read(tkr->clock);
+
+	/* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time */
+	delta = clocksource_delta(cycle_now, tkr->cycle_last, tkr->mask);
+
+	return delta;
+}
 #endif
 
 /**
@@ -218,14 +247,10 @@ static inline u32 arch_gettimeoffset(void) { return 0; }
 
 static inline s64 timekeeping_get_ns(struct tk_read_base *tkr)
 {
-	cycle_t cycle_now, delta;
+	cycle_t delta;
 	s64 nsec;
 
-	/* read clocksource: */
-	cycle_now = tkr->read(tkr->clock);
-
-	/* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
-	delta = clocksource_delta(cycle_now, tkr->cycle_last, tkr->mask);
+	delta = timekeeping_get_delta(tkr);
 
 	nsec = delta * tkr->mult + tkr->xtime_nsec;
 	nsec >>= tkr->shift;
@@ -237,14 +262,10 @@ static inline s64 timekeeping_get_ns(struct tk_read_base *tkr)
 static inline s64 timekeeping_get_ns_raw(struct timekeeper *tk)
 {
 	struct clocksource *clock = tk->tkr.clock;
-	cycle_t cycle_now, delta;
+	cycle_t delta;
 	s64 nsec;
 
-	/* read clocksource: */
-	cycle_now = tk->tkr.read(clock);
-
-	/* calculate the delta since the last update_wall_time: */
-	delta = clocksource_delta(cycle_now, tk->tkr.cycle_last, tk->tkr.mask);
+	delta = timekeeping_get_delta(&tk->tkr);
 
 	/* convert delta to nanoseconds. */
 	nsec = clocksource_cyc2ns(delta, clock->mult, clock->shift);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ