[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150313035317.712e271d@ultegra>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 03:53:17 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: kazutomo <kazutomo.yoshii@...il.com>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap/rapl: handle domain energy unit
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:50:20 -0500
kazutomo <kazutomo.yoshii@...il.com> wrote:
> On 03/12/2015 05:05 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:59:43 -0500
> > kazutomo <kazutomo.yoshii@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> according to the document, future DRAM energy unit will always be
> >>> hardcoded to 15.3uJ, no enumeration since there is no domain
> >>> specific MSR for energy unit.
> >> Which document are you referring to?
> > Intel DocID:330784-001 Sept 2014
> > Intel Xeon Processor E5-1600 and E5-2600 V2 of 2.
>
> I think V2 is Ivy Bridge. Is this typo?
>
v2 is volume 2, glad you found the doc.
BTW, i just sent out v2 of the patch to address the issues, changes are
1. use pJ for driver energy unit
2. fix max_energy_range_uj, makes it per domain
3. add reference doc info to commit message
Thanks,
Jacob
> By googling, I found a datasheet titled:
> "Intel Xeon Processor E5-1600 and E5-2600 v3 Product Families, Volume
> 2 of 2. Datasheet, September 2014, Reference Number: 330784-001 "
>
> It clearly says "ENERGY_UNIT for DRAM domain is 15.3uJ."
>
> - kaz
>
--
Jacob Pan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists