[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150313105742.GS24885@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 11:57:42 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
srv_heupstream@...iatek.com, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, yh.chen@...iatek.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tianping Fang <tianping.fang@...iatek.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 2/2] rtc: mediatek: Add MT63xx RTC driver
Hi Eddie,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:29:23PM +0800, Eddie Huang wrote:
> > regmap_read() and regmap_write() can return errors. There is no
> > checking for this.
> >
>
> I encounter some trouble when I add code to check return value of
> regmap_read and regmap_write. Every RTC register access through regmap,
> and there are many register read/write in this driver. If I check every
> return value, the driver will become ugly. I try to make this driver
> clean using following macro.
>
> static int __rtc_read(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc, u32 offset, u32 *data)
> {
> u32 addr = rtc->addr_base + offset;
>
> if (offset < rtc->addr_range)
> return regmap_read(rtc->regmap, addr, data);
>
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> #define rtc_read(ret, rtc, offset, data) \
> ({ \
> ret = __rtc_read(rtc, offset, data); \
> if (ret < 0) \
> goto rtc_exit; \
> }) \
Hiding a goto (or return) in a macro is a very bad idea.
what you can do is
ret |= regmap_read(rtc->regmap, RTC_TC_SEC, &tm->tm_sec);
ret |= regmap_read(rtc->regmap, RTC_TC_MIN, &tm->tm_min);
if (ret)
return -EIO;
(Don't return ret in this case though as it might contain different
error codes orred together)
Another possibilty at least for contiguous registers would be
regmap_bulk_read().
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists