[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANaxB-yaHuBr-rQZeXDCV2VOn=ou8hKuTswyDTrUKBWnT1iANw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:06:23 +0300
From: Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/kcmp: exit with non-zero code in a fail case
2015-03-13 13:37 GMT+03:00 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>:
> On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 12:27 +0300, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
>> index 572c888..a0ec8b8 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h
>> @@ -58,5 +58,17 @@ static inline int ksft_exit_skip(void)
>> {
>> exit(4);
>> }
>> +static inline int ksft_exit(void)
>> +{
>> + if (ksft_cnt.ksft_fail)
>> + return ksft_exit_fail();
>> + if (ksft_cnt.ksft_xpass)
>> + return ksft_exit_xpass();
>> + if (ksft_cnt.ksft_xskip)
>> + return ksft_exit_skip();
>> + if (ksft_cnt.ksft_xfail)
>> + return ksft_exit_xfail();
>> + ksft_exit_pass();
>> +}
>
> This function claims to return 'int', but doesn't. So do all the others.
I agree with this. I haven't seen any warning, because exit() never
returns back.
>
> It could be as simple as:
I think it isn't a good idea. In my version we can be sure that
ksft_exit_fail() and ksft_exit() return the same code in a fail case.
>
> static inline void ksft_exit(void)
> {
> if (ksft_cnt.ksft_fail)
> exit(1);
>
> if (ksft_cnt.ksft_xpass)
> exit(3);
>
> if (ksft_cnt.ksft_xskip)
> exit(4);
>
> if (ksft_cnt.ksft_xfail)
> exit(2);
>
> exit(0);
> }
>
> cheers
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists