linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] netfilter: Fix format string of nfnetlink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5502F28F.9050601@nod.at>
Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:22:07 +0100
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	coreteam@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
	aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org, lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] netfilter: Fix format string of nfnetlink_queue proc
 file

Am 13.03.2015 um 14:53 schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 02:43:54PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 13.03.2015 um 13:15 schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso:
>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:31:16PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>>> The printed values are all of type unsigned integer, therefore use
>>>> %u instead of %d. Otherwise an user can face negative values.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes:
>>>> $ cat /proc/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue
>>>>     0  29508   278 2 65531     0 2004213241 -2129885586  1
>>>>     1 -27747     0 2 65531     0     0        0  1
>>>>     2 -27748     0 2 65531     0     0        0  1
>>>
>>> I guess you want to access stats on dropped packets.
>>
>> Correct. :)
>>
>>> I prefer if you extend nfnetlink_queue to provide statistics through
>>> nfnetlink_queue, so you don't have to manually parse this text-based
>>> /proc entry and we can deprecate this interface. That shouldn't have
>>> been there in first place.
>>
>> You mean statistics via netlink attributes? I can add that!
> 
> Add a new NFQNL_CFG_CMD_STATS command to request the statistics. If
> NLM_F_DUMP is set, then we'll basically provide the full list of
> instances. Otherwise, in case you want to retrieve stats for a
> specific netlink socket, you can use the netlink portID as index.
> And you'll have to add attributes for this new command, yes.

This was my plan. Thanks for the pointer!

>> But I think we should also fix the format string of the proc file
>> as the fix is easy and non-intrusive.
> 
> Unfortunately we don't know how many people are relying on that
> output, I prefer to remain conservative and provide a proper netlink
> interface for this.

I understand your concerns but an application which is able to parse positive
and negative numbers can also parse pure positives.
Just made a small test application, glibc's %d in sscanf() can also deal with UINT_MAX.
And I don't expect that applications to check whether the returned values from
/proc/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue are between INT_MIN and INT_MAX.

That said, I'd have assumed that an user would report negative values as plain kernel bug.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/