[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550311FA.9000908@atmel.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:36:10 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Atmel System Timer cleanups
Le 13/03/2015 11:33, Daniel Lezcano a écrit :
> On 03/13/2015 11:33 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 13/03/2015 at 11:23:05 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote :
>>> On 03/12/2015 01:07 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>>>> This patch set cleans up the system timer driver.
>>>>
>>>> The main goal is to get rid of the mach/ headers dependency. At the same time,
>>>> it introduces proper probing and locking (using a regmap) for the watchdog
>>>> driver.
>>>>
>>>> This is based on 4.0-rc1 and will have two merge conflicts with my cleanup #1 in
>>>> mach-at91/at91rm9200.c
>>>>
>>>> It also needs this patch to probe the watchdog properly:
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/327274.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Alexandre,
>>>
>>> through which tree do you want this patchset to be merged ?
>>>
>>
>> I'd say through the at91 tree as I have another series that depend on
>> that one
>
> Ok.
Absolutely. To the whole series:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
And I stack it on at91-4.1-cleanup right now.
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists