lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3936339.LqGDoxnsbi@wuerfel>
Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:55:30 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Remove mach-msm and associated code

On Friday 13 March 2015 11:09:33 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The maintainers for mach-msm no longer have any plans to support
> or test the platforms supported by this architecture[1]. Most likely
> there aren't any active users of this code anyway, so let's
> delete it and the associated drivers/code. We should probably merge
> this as one big series through arm-soc. Although some patches
> should be fine to take through maintainers, some things like
> mmc and usb have header file dependencies for platform_data.
> 
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150307031212.GA8434@fifo99.com
> 

As I wrote, I'd have a mild preference for doing the multiplatform
conversion first and then removing the support in the following merge
window, just in case someone wants that code back.

If everyone wants to see that code die rather sooner than later,
that's fine with me as well.

I think the MMC driver should also be removed when the platform
code is deleted, new code would use the mmci driver anyway.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ