[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55035623.8010002@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:26:59 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC: lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lina.iyer@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach
On 03/13/2015 07:29 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 03:25:34PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> do you agree with this patchset ?
>
> In principle yes, apart from some function naming and I'm waiting for
> Lorenzo's ack as well. Do you plan to upstream this directly via your
> tree? If yes, I'll look in more detail and give some acks.
If you don't care, I would like to upstream via my tree because there is
a couple of operations (like sharing a branch) I would like to monitor
to let people build their driver on top of it: renesas and qcom.
Qcom's cpuidle driver is already implemented and waits for this patchset
to be upstream (the patchset has been around long enough). And I believe
the Renesas driver will be reworked to use it also.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists