[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150314111648.GD3114@pd.tnic>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:16:48 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Riikonen <priikone@....fi>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] x86/cpu: don't allocate fpu->state for swapper/0
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 07:26:56PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> This patch is "out of order" a bit, but since Borislav mentioned this
> during review...
>
> And I was going to send the 2nd one (below), but it turns out that
> __init_refok is not discarded? So is there any way to do
>
> void __init init_function();
>
> void non_init_func()
> {
> if (can_only_be_true_before_free_initmem)
> init_function();
> }
>
> and avoid the warning?
Actually, I was wondering if we could be even more radical and do
the boot cpu-specific stuff only in the BSP boot path. For example,
somewhere down that path:
start_kernel
|-> check_bugs
|-> check_fpu --- btw, we do FPU stuff here already too
|-> xstate_enable_boot_cpu
instead of this state machine with function pointers hackery.
I'll try to play with this and see whether something breaks.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists