lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 14 Mar 2015 18:19:16 +0200
From:	Alex Dowad <alexinbeijing@...il.com>
To:	josh@...htriplett.org
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] do_fork(): Rename 'stack_size' argument to reflect
 actual use


On 14/03/15 01:04, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:04:16PM +0200, Alex Dowad wrote:
>> The 'stack_size' argument is never used to pass a stack size. It's only used when
>> forking a kernel thread, in which case it is an argument which should be passed
>> to the 'main' function which the kernel thread executes. Hence, rename it to
>> 'kthread_arg'.
> That's not the only use of stack_size.  Take a look at the clone2 system
> call (very minimally documented in the clone manpage) and the
> implementation of copy_thread on ia64, which does use stack_size in the
> non-kthread path.
Thanks for pointing that out. I searched for all uses with cscope but 
missed sys_clone2 (which is implemented in asm). Won't make that mistake 
again...

I've just been searching for history on sys_clone2() but have come up 
empty. "git blame" isn't helping, either... the current code dates back 
before the start of the git history.

So out of curiosity, if you are willing to explain more: why does clone2 
only exist on IA-64? Is there some characteristic of the architecture 
that makes being able to specify the size of the user-mode stack 
especially valuable, as compared to other archs? Is it used much (such 
as being called from the C library)?

Thanks for your feedback,
Alex Dowad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ