linux-kernel - [Patch 0/5] dt: unittest: fix breakage and warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5503C65F.4030000@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:25:51 -0700
From:	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [Patch 0/5] dt: unittest: fix breakage and warnings

Running checkpatch on early versions of my patchset to fix the devicetree
make dependency issues exposed a large number of warnings, including some that
are actual bugs.  http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1503.1/03335.html

These patches fix those bugs, and another bug exposed by fixing those bugs.
As a result, the number of tests completed increased from 102 to 107.

Since I was already poking around, I fixed a few classes of checkpatch warnings.

There are still plenty of warnings, but the noise is greatly reduced and future
checkpatch warnings that are problems should stand out more clearly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/