linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 07/16] staging: rtl8723au: else is not generally useful after a return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1426378241-32469-8-git-send-email-m.v.b@runbox.com>
Date:	Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:10:32 -0400
From:	"M. Vefa Bicakci" <m.v.b@...box.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	joe@...ches.com, Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com,
	m.v.b@...box.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/16] staging: rtl8723au: else is not generally useful after a return

Correct a checkpatch.pl warning regarding rtl8723au's
rtw_security.c::crc32_init pointing out that having an else statement
after a break or a return is not useful.

drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c:105:
	WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return

Signed-off-by: M. Vefa Bicakci <m.v.b@...box.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c | 42 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c
index f7b1d45981..f7571cf091 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/core/rtw_security.c
@@ -99,31 +99,33 @@ static u8 crc32_reverseBit(u8 data)
 
 static void crc32_init(void)
 {
+	int i, j;
+	u32 c;
+	u8 *p, *p1;
+	u8 k;
 
 	if (bcrc32initialized == 1)
 		return;
-	else{
-		int i, j;
-		u32 c;
-		u8 *p = (u8 *)&c, *p1;
-		u8 k;
-
-		c = 0x12340000;
-
-		for (i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
-			k = crc32_reverseBit((u8)i);
-			for (c = ((u32)k) << 24, j = 8; j > 0; --j) {
-				c = c & 0x80000000 ? (c << 1) ^ CRC32_POLY : (c << 1);
-			}
-			p1 = (u8 *)&crc32_table[i];
-
-			p1[0] = crc32_reverseBit(p[3]);
-			p1[1] = crc32_reverseBit(p[2]);
-			p1[2] = crc32_reverseBit(p[1]);
-			p1[3] = crc32_reverseBit(p[0]);
+
+	p = (u8 *) &c;
+	c = 0x12340000;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
+		k = crc32_reverseBit((u8)i);
+
+		for (c = ((u32)k) << 24, j = 8; j > 0; --j) {
+			c = c & 0x80000000 ? (c << 1) ^ CRC32_POLY : (c << 1);
 		}
-		bcrc32initialized = 1;
+
+		p1 = (u8 *)&crc32_table[i];
+
+		p1[0] = crc32_reverseBit(p[3]);
+		p1[1] = crc32_reverseBit(p[2]);
+		p1[2] = crc32_reverseBit(p[1]);
+		p1[3] = crc32_reverseBit(p[0]);
 	}
+
+	bcrc32initialized = 1;
 }
 
 static u32 getcrc32(u8 *buf, int len)
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/