[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150316081153.GA16393@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 09:11:53 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86_64,signal: Fix SS handling for signals
delivered to 64-bit programs
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
>
> The comment in the signal code says that apps can save/restore other
> segments on their own. It's true that apps can *save* SS on their
> own, but there's no way for apps to restore it: SYSCALL effectively
> resets SS to __USER_DS, so any value that user code tries to load
> into SS gets lost on entry to sigreturn.
>
> This recycles two padding bytes in the segment selector area for SS.
>
> While we're at it, we need a second change to make this useful. If
> the signal we're delivering is caused by a bad SS value, saving that
> value isn't enough. We need to remove that bad value from the regs
> before we try to deliver the signal. Oddly, x32 already got this
> right.
Note, it's the original i386 code that got this right, not the
(relatively new) x32 code. I fixed this in the commit that I applied.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists