linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging/sm75fb: Declare static functions as such

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPybu_0DKQnGs324ayKZ3LAnFiwQ+1+6bL7Esiu_bimuoa578A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:54:47 +0100
From:	Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>
To:	Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/sm75fb: Declare static functions as such

Hello Lorenzo

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com> wrote:

>
> I currently have a patch series awaiting the final ok which includes
> fixes for these warnings
> (http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1503.1/02535.html),
> apologies but assuming there isn't something hideously wrong with my
> series I suspect they supersedes this patch :(

Sorry about that, I did pull from linux-next and I am crealy not
subscribed to the right mailing list.


>
> It's really easy to accidentally submit a patch that has already been
> covered elsewhere; I, as a rather new kernel contributor, always find
> I have to search quite a bit to be *sure* that it's not been covered
> already.

I miss something like the properly maintained patchwork on
linux-media. It works really well to see what is on the pipeline. I
honestly never thought that somebody will take a look to this driver
:)

>
> Additionally, your subject line is 'staging/sm75fb: Declare static
> functions as such' which ought to be 'staging: sm750fb: Declare static
> functions as such' - there's a typo in the device name and I think the
> convention is always to use colons in subject lines.

About the typo, you are right of course :)

Regarding the colon, there is no convention about that, every
subsystem has its own preference. I prefer / than :

I agree that is your patch that should be pulled, not this one. But I
think you should split your patch in one patch per file.

All that said

Nacked-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@...il.com>

>
> Best,

Thanks!

>
> --
> Lorenzo Stoakes
> https:/ljs.io



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/