linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] Documentation: DT: Document twl4030-madc-battery bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150316210532.GA11441@amd>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:05:32 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com>
Cc:	sre@...nel.org, dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
	mark.rutland@....com, tony@...mide.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	hns@...delico.com, gta04-owner@...delico.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] Documentation: DT: Document twl4030-madc-battery
 bindings

On Wed 2015-02-04 23:14:32, Marek Belisko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek@...delico.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..bb3580c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power_supply/twl4030_madc_battery.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
> +twl4030_madc_battery
> +
> +Required properties:
> + - compatible : "ti,twl4030-madc-battery"
> + - capacity-uah : battery capacity in uAh

Could we make it capacity-uAh ?

> + - volt-to-capacity-charging-map : list of voltage(mV):level(%) values
> +	for charging calibration (see example)
> + - volt-to-capacity-discharging-map : list of voltage(mV):level(%) values
> +	for discharging calibration (see example)

Would "mV-to-capacity..." be more accurate? Also, would it make sense
to introduce coefficients for temperature and discharge rate?

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/