linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: syscon: Add atmel system timer registers definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:17:16 +0000
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: syscon: Add atmel system timer registers
 definition

On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, Nicolas Ferre wrote:

> Le 13/03/2015 11:40, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 13/03/2015 at 08:03:15 +0000, Lee Jones wrote :
> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >>
> >>> AT91RM920 has a memory range reserved for timer and watchdog configuration.
> >>> Expose those registers so that drivers can make use of the system timer syscon
> >>> declared in at91 DTs.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>  include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-st.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+)
> >>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-st.h
> >>
> >> Applied, thanks.
> 
> > Actually, I was thinking this could go through the at91 to avoid
> > depending on your branch.
> 
> Lee,
> 
> I was planning to take the whole series with me to limit the number of
> merge conflicts and dependencies.
> Do you mind if I take this patch with the other AT91 cleanup patches
> through the arm-soc tree?
> If you are okay, can you remove this patch already applied on your tree?

Yes, no problem.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/