[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5506BF89.9040703@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:33:29 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"graeme.gregory@...aro.org" <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
"jcm@...hat.com" <jcm@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@...eaurora.org>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 18/21] ARM64 / ACPI: Select ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY
if ACPI is enabled on ARM64
On 2015年03月13日 19:04, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:28:45AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> /*
>>> * acpi_boot_table_init() called from setup_arch(), always.
>>> * 1. find RSDP and get its address, and then find XSDT
>>> * 2. extract all tables and checksums them all
>>> * 3. check ACPI FADT revision
>>> + * 4. check ACPI FADT HW reduced flag
>>> *
>>> * We can parse ACPI boot-time tables such as MADT after
>>> * this function is called.
>>> */
>>> void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
>>> {
>>> + struct acpi_table_header *table;
>>> + struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt;
>>> + acpi_status status;
>>> + acpi_size tbl_size;
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless
>>> * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or
>>> @@ -351,19 +318,52 @@ void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
>>> (!param_acpi_force && of_scan_flat_dt(dt_scan_depth1_nodes, NULL)))
>>> return;
>>>
>>> - enable_acpi();
>>> -
>>> /* Initialize the ACPI boot-time table parser. */
>>> if (acpi_table_init()) {
>>
>> Since we disable ACPI in default, it is a bit strange for me to init all
>> the ACPI tables and parse FADT when ACPI is disabled, could you
>> put some comments here to clarify the purpose? other than that, it is looks
>> good to me.
>
> Ok, the purpose was to make things simpler, but I think that given
> current code it is not 100% safe to init ACPI tables with
> acpi_disabled == 1.
>
> To me having to enable ACPI to parse the tables and check *if* ACPI tables
> are there is a bit crazy, but I agree with you that given current code
> it is safer.
>
> Patch rewritten, here below, please have a look, test it and rework
> bits as needed, I added comments where I thought they were needed but
> please add to that if you feel it is worth it.
>
> It should be easy to split, let me know if you want an incremental
> version.
This one is much better, pretty fine to me, thanks!
I assume that this patch is cleanup patch on top of ARM64 ACPI
core patches, right?
Thanks
Hanjun
>
> Thanks !
> Lorenzo
>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index 5819ef7..e5ee4d4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -291,43 +291,60 @@ void acpi_unregister_gsi(u32 gsi)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_unregister_gsi);
>
> -static int __init acpi_parse_fadt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
> +/*
> + * acpi_fadt_sanity_check() - Check FADT presence and carry out sanity
> + * checks on it
> + *
> + * Return 0 on success, <0 on failure
> + */
> +static int __init acpi_fadt_sanity_check(void)
> {
> - struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
> + struct acpi_table_header *table;
> + struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt;
> + acpi_status status;
> + acpi_size tbl_size;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * FADT is required on arm64; retrieve it to check its presence
> + * and carry out revision and ACPI HW reduced compliancy tests
> + */
> + status = acpi_get_table_with_size(ACPI_SIG_FADT, 0, &table, &tbl_size);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + const char *msg = acpi_format_exception(status);
> +
> + pr_err("Failed to get FADT table, %s\n", msg);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + fadt = (struct acpi_table_fadt *)table;
>
> /*
> * Revision in table header is the FADT Major revision, and there
> * is a minor revision of FADT which was introduced by ACPI 5.1,
> * we only deal with ACPI 5.1 or newer revision to get GIC and SMP
> - * boot protocol configuration data, or we will disable ACPI.
> + * boot protocol configuration data.
> */
> - if (table->revision > 5 ||
> - (table->revision == 5 && fadt->minor_revision >= 1)) {
> - if (!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware) {
> - pr_err("Not hardware reduced ACPI mode, will not be supported\n");
> - goto disable_acpi;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * ACPI 5.1 only has two explicit methods to boot up SMP,
> - * PSCI and Parking protocol, but the Parking protocol is
> - * only specified for ARMv7 now, so make PSCI as the only
> - * way for the SMP boot protocol before some updates for
> - * the Parking protocol spec.
> - */
> - if (acpi_psci_present())
> - return 0;
> -
> - pr_warn("No PSCI support, will not bring up secondary CPUs\n");
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + if (table->revision < 5 ||
> + (table->revision == 5 && fadt->minor_revision < 1)) {
> + pr_err("Unsupported FADT revision %d.%d, should be 5.1+\n",
> + table->revision, fadt->minor_revision);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> }
>
> - pr_warn("Unsupported FADT revision %d.%d, should be 5.1+, will disable ACPI\n",
> - table->revision, fadt->minor_revision);
> + if (!(fadt->flags & ACPI_FADT_HW_REDUCED)) {
> + pr_err("FADT not ACPI hardware reduced compliant\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> -disable_acpi:
> - disable_acpi();
> - return -EINVAL;
> +out:
> + /*
> + * acpi_get_table_with_size() creates FADT table mapping that
> + * should be released after parsing and before resuming boot
> + */
> + early_acpi_os_unmap_memory((char *)table, tbl_size);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -335,12 +352,17 @@ disable_acpi:
> * 1. find RSDP and get its address, and then find XSDT
> * 2. extract all tables and checksums them all
> * 3. check ACPI FADT revision
> + * 4. check ACPI FADT HW reduced flag
> *
> * We can parse ACPI boot-time tables such as MADT after
> * this function is called.
> + *
> + * ACPI is enabled on return if ACPI tables initialized and sanity checks
> + * passed, disabled otherwise
> */
> void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
> {
> +
> /*
> * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless
> * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or
> @@ -351,19 +373,32 @@ void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
> (!param_acpi_force && of_scan_flat_dt(dt_scan_depth1_nodes, NULL)))
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * ACPI is disabled at this point. Enable it in order to parse
> + * the ACPI tables and carry out sanity checks
> + */
> enable_acpi();
>
> /* Initialize the ACPI boot-time table parser. */
> if (acpi_table_init()) {
> - disable_acpi();
> - return;
> + pr_err("Failed to init ACPI tables\n");
> + goto init_failed;
> }
>
> - if (acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_FADT, acpi_parse_fadt)) {
> - /* disable ACPI if no FADT is found */
> - disable_acpi();
> - pr_err("Can't find FADT\n");
> - }
> + /*
> + * Check FADT presence and carry out FADT sanity checks
> + */
> + if (acpi_fadt_sanity_check() < 0)
> + goto init_failed;
> +
> + /*
> + * ACPI tables initialized and FADT sanity checks passed, leave
> + * ACPI enabled and carry on booting
> + */
> + return;
> +
> +init_failed:
> + disable_acpi();
> }
>
> void __init acpi_gic_init(void)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists