[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-c8a470cab030bae8f9e6e5cfff72b047b7c627a7@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 05:06:32 -0700
From: tip-bot for Daniel J Blueman <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: daniel@...ascale.com, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
sp@...ascale.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, bp@...e.de, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/apic/numachip: Fix sibling map with NumaChip
Commit-ID: c8a470cab030bae8f9e6e5cfff72b047b7c627a7
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c8a470cab030bae8f9e6e5cfff72b047b7c627a7
Author: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:55:13 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:58:59 +0100
x86/apic/numachip: Fix sibling map with NumaChip
On NumaChip systems, the physical processor ID assignment wasn't
accounting for the number of nodes in AMD multi-module
processors, giving an incorrect sibling map:
$ cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/topology
$ grep . *
core_id:5
core_siblings:00000000,ff000000
core_siblings_list:24-31
physical_package_id:3
thread_siblings:00000000,30000000
thread_siblings_list:28-29
This fixes it:
$ cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/topology
$ grep . *
core_id:5
core_siblings:00000000,ffff0000
core_siblings_list:16-31
physical_package_id:1
thread_siblings:00000000,30000000
thread_siblings_list:28-29
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Steffen Persvold <sp@...ascale.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426135950-10110-1-git-send-email-daniel@numascale.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
index c2fd21f..017149c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
@@ -37,10 +37,12 @@ static const struct apic apic_numachip;
static unsigned int get_apic_id(unsigned long x)
{
unsigned long value;
- unsigned int id;
+ unsigned int id = (x >> 24) & 0xff;
- rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, value);
- id = ((x >> 24) & 0xffU) | ((value << 2) & 0xff00U);
+ if (static_cpu_has_safe(X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) {
+ rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, value);
+ id |= (value << 2) & 0xff00;
+ }
return id;
}
@@ -155,10 +157,18 @@ static int __init numachip_probe(void)
static void fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
{
- if (c->phys_proc_id != node) {
- c->phys_proc_id = node;
- per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node;
+ u64 val;
+ u32 nodes = 1;
+
+ this_cpu_write(cpu_llc_id, node);
+
+ /* Account for nodes per socket in multi-core-module processors */
+ if (static_cpu_has_safe(X86_FEATURE_NODEID_MSR)) {
+ rdmsrl(MSR_FAM10H_NODE_ID, val);
+ nodes = ((val >> 3) & 7) + 1;
}
+
+ c->phys_proc_id = node / nodes;
}
static int __init numachip_system_init(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists