linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Remove mentioning of block barriers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:26:17 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	"Leonid V. Fedorenchik" <leonidsbox@...il.com>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Remove mentioning of block barriers

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:53:22PM +0300, Leonid V. Fedorenchik wrote:
> Remove mentioning of block barriers since they were removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonid V. Fedorenchik <leonidsbox@...il.com>

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Re Jans comments:  this document is structurally out of date, as it's
framed aroudn the transition of the 2.4 to 2.5 block layer code.
Replacing it with something that just describes the current code
would be nice, nut not something I would want to bureden on someone
just removing the now incorrect parts of it.

And with blk-mq this is even more out of date now..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/