[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150316140934.331024322@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:09:42 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 25/62] btrfs: fix lost return value due to variable shadowing
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
commit 1932b7be973b554ffe20a5bba6ffaed6fa995cdc upstream.
A block-local variable stores error code but btrfs_get_blocks_direct may
not return it in the end as there's a ret defined in the function scope.
Fixes: d187663ef24c ("Btrfs: lock extents as we map them in DIO")
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6825,7 +6825,6 @@ static int btrfs_get_blocks_direct(struc
((BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) &&
em->block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE)) {
int type;
- int ret;
u64 block_start, orig_start, orig_block_len, ram_bytes;
if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PREALLOC, &em->flags))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists