[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150316140934.190676645@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:09:39 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"\"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Michael Scott\"" <michael.scott@...aro.org>,
Michael Scott <michael.scott@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 22/62] PM / QoS: remove duplicate call to pm_qos_update_target
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Michael Scott <michael.scott@...aro.org>
In 3.10.y backport patch 1dba303727f52ea062580b0a9b3f0c3b462769cf,
the logic to call pm_qos_update_target was moved to __pm_qos_update_request.
However, the original code was left in function pm_qos_update_request.
Currently, if pm_qos_update_request is called where new_value !=
req->node.prio then pm_qos_update_target will be called twice in a row.
Once in pm_qos_update_request and then again in the following call to
_pm_qos_update_request.
Removing the left over code from pm_qos_update_request stops this second
call to pm_qos_update_target where the work of removing / re-adding the
new_value in the constraints list would be duplicated.
Signed-off-by: Michael Scott <michael.scott@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/power/qos.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/power/qos.c
+++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
@@ -369,12 +369,6 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos
}
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&req->work);
-
- if (new_value != req->node.prio)
- pm_qos_update_target(
- pm_qos_array[req->pm_qos_class]->constraints,
- &req->node, PM_QOS_UPDATE_REQ, new_value);
-
__pm_qos_update_request(req, new_value);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_qos_update_request);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists