[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150316140815.062744880@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 15:07:30 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19 043/177] mm: page_alloc: revert inadvertent !__GFP_FS retry behavior change
3.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
commit cc87317726f851531ae8422e0c2d3d6e2d7b1955 upstream.
Historically, !__GFP_FS allocations were not allowed to invoke the OOM
killer once reclaim had failed, but nevertheless kept looping in the
allocator.
Commit 9879de7373fc ("mm: page_alloc: embed OOM killing naturally into
allocation slowpath"), which should have been a simple cleanup patch,
accidentally changed the behavior to aborting the allocation at that
point. This creates problems with filesystem callers (?) that currently
rely on the allocator waiting for other tasks to intervene.
Revert the behavior as it shouldn't have been changed as part of a
cleanup patch.
Fixes: 9879de7373fc ("mm: page_alloc: embed OOM killing naturally into allocation slowpath")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -2380,8 +2380,15 @@ __alloc_pages_may_oom(gfp_t gfp_mask, un
if (high_zoneidx < ZONE_NORMAL)
goto out;
/* The OOM killer does not compensate for light reclaim */
- if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS))
+ if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) {
+ /*
+ * XXX: Page reclaim didn't yield anything,
+ * and the OOM killer can't be invoked, but
+ * keep looping as per should_alloc_retry().
+ */
+ *did_some_progress = 1;
goto out;
+ }
/*
* GFP_THISNODE contains __GFP_NORETRY and we never hit this.
* Sanity check for bare calls of __GFP_THISNODE, not real OOM.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists