[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150316175826.GR22995@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:58:26 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Riikonen <priikone@....fi>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] x86/fpu: avoid "xstate_fault" in
xsave_user/xrestore_user
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:57:42PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Sure, I won't argue if we use the new macros instead. But we already have
> check_insn/user_insn, why not use them?
It certainly is worth a try.
> to me check_insn(ALTERNATIVE_2(...)) looks better. Except we need the
> clobber. It is not easy to read the code like this, imo it would be better
> to avoid copy-and-paste and use the helpers we already have. Just we need
> to improve them.
Yeah, I can't say I'm crazy about those check_insn macros either but
certainly worth a try. Apparently they're the way to go in the fpu code
so let's try to use them...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists