lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55071B6B.3010102@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:05:31 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add kerneldoc for pcommit_sfence()

On 03/16/2015 01:35 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> :-/
> 
> Not sure what hpa's problem with 'void *' was: especially in MM code 
> we are using 'void *' rather widely.
> 
> All compilers that aim for being able to build the Linux kernel 
> implement 'void *' as well, so that 'standard C' argument is pretty 
> weak IMHO - unlike some of the more esoteric GCC extensions, this one 
> is actually pretty well done and widely used in and outside of the 
> kernel.
> 
>> It seems like both have arguments for them.  Char pointer arithmetic 
>> has the advantage that its behavior is standard in C, so it's not 
>> specific to gcc.  I agree that void* has the advantage that it fits 
>> more naturally with the types of the parameters passed in, requiring 
>> no casting.
> 
> It's also a bonus property of 'void *' that unlike 'char *' it cannot 
> be dereferenced. So we use it for opaque buffers wherever we can.
> 

The issue isn't void *, it is doing arithmetic on void *.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ