[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150316182809.GA23705@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:28:09 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] mfd: wm5110: Set DCVDD voltage to 1.175V before
entering sleep mode
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 05:17:55PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 04:58:44PM +0000, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> > + } else {
> > + switch (arizona->type) {
> > + case WM5110:
> > + case WM8280:
> > + ret = regulator_set_voltage(arizona->dcvdd,
> > + 1175000, 1175000);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
>
> Can we please have a comment about this being the internal LDO and us
> therefore knowing exactly what voltages it supports (or just that it's
> the on chip LDO)? Going for a single voltage with zero tolerance is
> usually bad practice since it causes needless interoperability issues
> (eg, here the chances that the hardware would mind if an external
> regulator were only able to deliver 1.174V rather than 1.175V are
> minimal). This is fine here but people might be looking for examples
> and get the wrong idea.
Yeah no problem I will respin and add that.
Thanks,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists