[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150316191444.GZ29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:14:45 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Support follow_link in RCU-walk. - V2
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 03:43:19PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Hi Al,
> I believe this series addresses all your concerns about
> my first attempt.
> The first patch results in nameidata being almost completely
> localized to namei.c :-) It also highlights out-of-date
> documentation in automount-support.txt :-(
>
> It also exposes (and removes) some ... interesting code in lustre.
> I'm not sure how safe it is to remove that.... I didn't think
> recursive symlinks used extra stack.
Recursive nested symlinks *do* use extra stack; it's not in fs code, though.
make fs/namei.s and check link_path_walk; AFAICS, on amd64 it's 192 bytes per
level, on sparc64 - 256, sparc32 and ppc32 - 144, ppc64 - obscenely fat 336...
It's more that lustre is an extreme stack hog; call its methods on slightly
deeper stack and you are screwed. I don't _know_ if that's pure paranoia -
might very well be. OTOH, it might be not paranoid enough. OTTH, if it
manages to survive 5 levels on 4K stack, it ought to survive 8 levels on 8K
one; if 3 times the footprint of link_path_walk pushes the total by more 4K,
there's no way in hell to fit 5 times that footprint into 4K stack, nevermind
the rest of call chain...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists