linux-kernel - Re: [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5507CA2E.3040600@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:31:10 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	"Sudeep Holla" <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwinc@...eaurora.org>,
	<suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
	Zhangdianfang <zhangdianfang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [update][PATCH v10 06/21] ACPI / sleep: Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP

On 2015/3/17 13:59, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 12:10 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> On 2015/3/17 11:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 10:36:47 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>> Well, almost.  There is one problem with that, becuase sleep.c contains code
>>> outside of the ACPI_SLEEP-dependent blocks.  That code is used for powering
>>> off ACPI platforms.
>>>
>>> I guess you don't want that code on ARM too, right?
>> Yes, you are right.
>>> Perhaps we can use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for that?  ARM64 will be the
>> Sorry, I can't fully understand your intention here, could you please
>> explain it more?
>>
>> Let me guess a little bit. Do you mean use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY for
>> powering off ACPI platforms? if so, I guess it's not a good idea, ACPI spec
>> only says that S4BIOS is not supported on HW-reduced ACPI platforms, S5
>> has no such limitation, if I miss something here, please let me know.
> If helpful to the discussion, current SBBR (Server Base Boot
> Requirements[0]) design guidance is that for power off itself, we will
> prefer calling an EFI Runtime Service (that will preferentially call an
> PSCI - ARM Power State Coordination Interface - Secure Monitor Call (SMC
> - think SMI-like) internally to perform the shutdown/reboot) for the
> action of powering off or resetting 64-bit ARM SBBR platforms.

Agreed, PSCI is the prefer method for power off on ARM64 I think.

>
> Therefore if the alternative of an ACPI-based power off solution were
> not initially supported, I don't think it would have much practical
> impact, and it could be addressed after the initial support merged.

I agree. Actually we already removed ACPI power off code for ARM64
in v9 and v10 regardless the ACPI sepc statement about S5, I just want to
confirm with Rafael that how to use ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE_ONLY properly
to do the same thing as we do in v10 (patch - ACPI / sleep: Introduce
CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_SLEEP), or if we have some other way to do that :)

Thanks
Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/