[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150317071316.GA22758@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:13:16 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
keescook@...omium.org, ast@...mgrid.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
hpa@...or.com, wad@...omium.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/64: Remove unused
thread_struct::usersp
* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:20:38PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > What's your config?
>
> Attached.
Could you try just this patch (on top of broken tip:master):
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 66a1954439ea..997e6a1c288f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ struct thread_struct {
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
unsigned long sysenter_cs;
#else
+ unsigned long usersp; /* Copy from PDA */
unsigned short es;
unsigned short ds;
unsigned short fsindex;
to see whether it's the changed values of old_rsp, or the change in
sizeof(thread_struct), that causes the regression?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists