linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 102/175] x86/asm/entry/64: Remove a bogus 'ret_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <93ba6108cd76089d6ae16abec65ade5b11546d76.1426581621.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:41:20 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 102/175] x86/asm/entry/64: Remove a bogus 'ret_from_fork' optimization

From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 956421fbb74c3a6261903f3836c0740187cf038b upstream.

'ret_from_fork' checks TIF_IA32 to determine whether 'pt_regs' and
the related state make sense for 'ret_from_sys_call'.  This is
entirely the wrong check.  TS_COMPAT would make a little more
sense, but there's really no point in keeping this optimization
at all.

This fixes a return to the wrong user CS if we came from int
0x80 in a 64-bit task.

Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4710be56d76ef994ddf59087aad98c000fbab9a4.1424989793.git.luto@amacapital.net
[ Backported from tip:x86/asm. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
index e96560628571..7b22af265d12 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -542,11 +542,14 @@ ENTRY(ret_from_fork)
 	testl $3, CS-ARGOFFSET(%rsp)		# from kernel_thread?
 	jz   1f
 
-	testl $_TIF_IA32, TI_flags(%rcx)	# 32-bit compat task needs IRET
-	jnz  int_ret_from_sys_call
-
-	RESTORE_TOP_OF_STACK %rdi, -ARGOFFSET
-	jmp ret_from_sys_call			# go to the SYSRET fastpath
+	/*
+	 * By the time we get here, we have no idea whether our pt_regs,
+	 * ti flags, and ti status came from the 64-bit SYSCALL fast path,
+	 * the slow path, or one of the ia32entry paths.
+	 * Use int_ret_from_sys_call to return, since it can safely handle
+	 * all of the above.
+	 */
+	jmp  int_ret_from_sys_call
 
 1:
 	subq $REST_SKIP, %rsp	# leave space for volatiles
-- 
2.3.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/