linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 2/5] ARM: dts: Prepare exynos5410-odroidxu device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:10:11 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
To:	'Javier Martinez Canillas' <javier@...hile0.org>,
	'Andreas Färber' <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 'Kukjin Kim' <kgene@...nel.org>,
	'김학주' <ruppi.kim@...dkernel.com>,
	'Tomasz Figa' <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	'Humberto Naves' <hsnaves@...il.com>,
	'Jan Kiszka' <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	'Johann Pfefferl' <johann.pfefferl@...mens.com>,
	'Ben Gamari' <bgamari.foss@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	'Linux Kernel' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/5] ARM: dts: Prepare exynos5410-odroidxu device tree

Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> 
> Hello Andreas,
> 
Hi,

> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> wrote:
> > Am 16.03.2015 um 08:56 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas:
> >>
> >> I think this should be defined in exynos5410.dtsi instead since is an
> >> IP block in the SoC and referenced in the .dts using a label to change
> >> the clock-frequency in the board.
> >
> > I hope you understood that this is a literal copy of smdk5410, so I'm
> > not going to make random changes here. If the Samsung guys want to make
> > this change for smdk5410, then fine, but otherwise - like for Snow and
> > Spring - I want to keep the diff -u low between the two.
> >
> 
> Yes I did understand that it was a copy but I thought it could be
> improved anyways. But I don't have a strong opinion either to block
> this series and always both DTS can be changed as a follow-up. So I'm
> ok with your decision to keeping the delta to the minimum for now.
> 
Yeah, everybody can update everything in mainline if it can be got review in
mailinglist. BTW asthe fin_pll can be different according to board condition
that's why it is defined in each boart DT file, it is mostly same on each
boards though...So I think keeping it would be more make sense.

Thanks,
Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/