[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150317113648.GC3589@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 04:36:48 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 tip/core/rcu 01/22] smpboot: Add common code for
notification from dying CPU
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:18:07AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:37:45AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > RCU ignores offlined CPUs, so they cannot safely run RCU read-side code.
> > (They -can- use SRCU, but not RCU.) This means that any use of RCU
> > during or after the call to arch_cpu_idle_dead(). Unfortunately,
> > commit 2ed53c0d6cc99 added a complete() call, which will contain RCU
> > read-side critical sections if there is a task waiting to be awakened.
>
> Got a little more detail there?
Quite possibly. But exactly what sort of detail are you looking for?
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists