| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150316223318.02145751@grimm.local.home> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:33:18 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kill kmemcheck On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 21:48:23 -0400 Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote: > Steven, > > > Since the only objection raised was the too-newiness of GCC 4.9.2/5.0, what > would you consider a good time-line for removal? > > I haven't heard any "over my dead body" objections, so I guess that trying > to remove it while no distribution was shipping the compiler that would make > it possible was premature. > > Although, on the other hand, I'd be happy if we can have a reasonable date > (that is before my kid goes to college), preferably even before the next > LSF/MM so that we could have a mission accomplished thingie with a round > of beers and commemorative t-shirts. Perhaps give it 2 years? With fair notice that it will soon be gone? In 2 years I should be up to gcc 4.9 ;-) I still need to test it out. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists