[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-c80e5c0c23ce2282476fdc64c4b5e3d3a40723fd@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 06:03:47 -0700
From: tip-bot for Eugene Shatokhin <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86:
Return correct length in __copy_instruction()
Commit-ID: c80e5c0c23ce2282476fdc64c4b5e3d3a40723fd
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c80e5c0c23ce2282476fdc64c4b5e3d3a40723fd
Author: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru>
AuthorDate: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:09:18 +0900
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:00:38 +0100
kprobes/x86: Return correct length in __copy_instruction()
On x86-64, __copy_instruction() always returns 0 (error) if the
instruction uses %rip-relative addressing. This is because
kernel_insn_init() is called the second time for 'insn' instance
in such cases and sets all its fields to 0.
Because of this, trying to place a kprobe on such instruction
will fail, register_kprobe() will return -EINVAL.
This patch fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150317100918.28349.94654.stgit@localhost.localdomain
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 4e3d5a9..03189d8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -354,6 +354,7 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
{
struct insn insn;
kprobe_opcode_t buf[MAX_INSN_SIZE];
+ int length;
unsigned long recovered_insn =
recover_probed_instruction(buf, (unsigned long)src);
@@ -361,16 +362,18 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
return 0;
kernel_insn_init(&insn, (void *)recovered_insn, MAX_INSN_SIZE);
insn_get_length(&insn);
+ length = insn.length;
+
/* Another subsystem puts a breakpoint, failed to recover */
if (insn.opcode.bytes[0] == BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION)
return 0;
- memcpy(dest, insn.kaddr, insn.length);
+ memcpy(dest, insn.kaddr, length);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (insn_rip_relative(&insn)) {
s64 newdisp;
u8 *disp;
- kernel_insn_init(&insn, dest, insn.length);
+ kernel_insn_init(&insn, dest, length);
insn_get_displacement(&insn);
/*
* The copied instruction uses the %rip-relative addressing
@@ -394,7 +397,7 @@ int __copy_instruction(u8 *dest, u8 *src)
*(s32 *) disp = (s32) newdisp;
}
#endif
- return insn.length;
+ return length;
}
static int arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists