lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX0xhLRswsQs6=kQVycQ7sZynMobHY0ySX+oMMPEg=79Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:06:31 +0100
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: cpuidle: Remove the pointless default driver

Hi Daniel,

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> The default idle driver uses one state with the WFI instruction.
> The default idle routine invokes WFI when no cpuidle driver is present.
>
> The default cpuidle driver is pointless and does not give more than the
> default idle routine and moreover it pulls all the mathematics tied with
> the cpuidle governor for nothing, hence consuming more energy.
>
> Remove the default driver, the related code and register the driver directly.

Thanks for your patch!

> [compiled only - no board - no test]
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/common.h    |  3 ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpuidle.c   | 37 -------------------------------------
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-sh7372.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/common.h
> index 309025e..29b3088 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/common.h
> @@ -23,8 +23,6 @@ struct clk;
>  extern int shmobile_clk_init(void);
>  extern void shmobile_handle_irq_intc(struct pt_regs *);
>  extern struct platform_suspend_ops shmobile_suspend_ops;
> -struct cpuidle_driver;
> -extern void shmobile_cpuidle_set_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
>  int shmobile_suspend_init(void);
> @@ -51,7 +49,6 @@ extern void __iomem *shmobile_scu_base;
>  static inline void __init shmobile_init_late(void)
>  {
>         shmobile_suspend_init();
> -       shmobile_cpuidle_init();

Please remove the forward declaration and dummy for shmobile_cpuidle_init()
above, too.

>         shmobile_cpufreq_init();
>  }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpuidle.c
> index 0afeb5c..e69de29 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/cpuidle.c
> @@ -1,37 +0,0 @@

If you remove this file, you should remove its entry from
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/Makefile, too.
(did you use a config with CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=n?).

> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-sh7372.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-sh7372.c
> index c0293ae..9f19052 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-sh7372.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm-sh7372.c

Support for sh7372 is scheduled for removal in v4.1, so this will become
a no-op.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ