[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLfrGrVO=9sF6=TK0QQHq4SWRjL0urGu-e+e1H8gk9Y3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:33:27 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Meredydd Luff <meredydd@...atehouse.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Jorge Lucangeli Obes <jorgelo@...gle.com>,
Ricky Zhou <rickyz@...gle.com>,
Lee Campbell <leecam@...gle.com>,
Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>,
Mike Depinet <mdepinet@...gle.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
fstests@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 xfstests 2/3] generic: test openat and new O_BENEATH flag
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 02:00:11PM +0000, David Drysdale wrote:
>> Test basic openat(2) behaviour.
>>
>> Test that if O_BENEATH flag is set, openat() will only
>> open paths that have no .. component and do not start
>> with /. Symlinks are also checked for the same restrictions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Drysdale <drysdale@...gle.com>
>> ---
>> .gitignore | 1 +
>> common/openat | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> src/Makefile | 3 +-
>> src/openat.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> This strikes me as something that shoul dbe added to xfs_io for
> testing, as it already supports a heap of other open flags and
> xfstests is already dependent on it.
While I don't see a problem adding this to xfs_io, I'd still like to
see this test live in the kernel tree too. Having it in the same
source means more testing, IMO.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists