linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v13] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory barrier (x86)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <344874750.22632.1426618455680.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:54:15 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:	josh@...htriplett.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Nicholas Miell <nmiell@...cast.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v13] sys_membarrier(): system/process-wide memory
 barrier (x86)

----- Original Message -----
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 01:22:02PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > @@ -1568,6 +1568,15 @@ config PCI_QUIRKS
> >  	  bugs/quirks. Disable this only if your target machine is
> >  	  unaffected by PCI quirks.
> >  
> > +config MEMBARRIER
> > +	bool "Enable membarrier() system call" if EXPERT
> > +	default y
> > +	help
> > +	  Enable the membarrier() system call that allows issuing
> > +	  memory barriers across cores.
> 
> Nit: CPUs, not cores.  Nothing here is specific to
> packages/cores/threads.

Fixed.

> 
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/update.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/update.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> >  #include <linux/tick.h>
> > +#include <linux/syscalls.h>
> > +#include <linux/membarrier.h>
> >  
> >  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> >  
> > @@ -775,3 +777,73 @@ late_initcall(rcu_verify_early_boot_tests);
> >  #else
> >  void rcu_early_boot_tests(void) {}
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMBARRIER
> 
> As mentioned in my previous mail, please consider moving this to its own
> file, if it doesn't use any of the internals of kernel/rcu/update.c
> (which I don't think it does).  That then means you can enable/disable
> the entire file in the Makefile rather than using an #ifdef in the .c
> file.

Will do, thanks!

Mathieu

> 
> - Josh Triplett
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/