linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a modern way"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150317.150520.62518083516614772.davem@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:05:20 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...hat.com>
To:	robert.jarzmik@...e.fr
Cc:	linus.walleij@...aro.org, nico@...xnic.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a
 modern way"

From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:06:13 +0100

> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> 
>> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:48:49 +0100
>>
>>> Linus has submitted the patch [1]. I'll be watching carefully until -rc4 that
>>> this is applied. If it's not, I'll reping you to apply this revert. Until then,
>>> you can forget about it, I'll do the follow-up.
>>> 
>>> Does that plan sound good to you ?
>>
>> It sounds good to me.
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> Unfortunately Linus's patch didn't make it upstream. Therefore I'll ask you to
> apply the revert, which is reminded in [1].

Revert applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/