[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150317161309.52eb2b9d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:13:09 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, <stable-rt@...r.kernel.org>,
Nikita Yushchenko <nyushchenko@....rtsoft.ru>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 26/39] scheduling while atomic in cgroup code
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:10:11 -0400
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> [[PATCH RT 26/39] scheduling while atomic in cgroup code] On 12/03/2015 (Thu 15:13) Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > 3.14.34-rt32-rc1 stable review patch.
> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
> >
> > mm, memcg: make refill_stock() use get_cpu_light()
>
> This looks like only 1/2 of Mike's original patch:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/21/11
>
> I suspect that is because 3.18 could only use 1/2 of it, and based on
> the SOB lines, this is backported from 3.18.
>
> The other half applies to 3.14 -- testing in progress; not sure about
> the 3.10-rt and earlier....
Grumble. Yeah, I'm sure I got this from 3.18 and backported it.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists