[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1503171601230.11185@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: "Wang, Yalin" <Yalin.Wang@...ymobile.com>
cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] proc: change /proc/stat show
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
> index 510413eb..60b39e2 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/stat.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
> seq_putc(p, '\n');
>
> - for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> + for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> /* Copy values here to work around gcc-2.95.3, gcc-2.96 */
> user = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_USER];
> nice = kcpustat_cpu(i).cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE];
> @@ -153,6 +153,7 @@ static int show_stat(struct seq_file *p, void *v)
> seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(steal));
> seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(guest));
> seq_put_decimal_ull(p, ' ', cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
> + seq_printf(p, " %d", cpu_online(i)? 1 : 0);
> seq_putc(p, '\n');
> }
> seq_printf(p, "intr %llu", (unsigned long long)sum);
Makes sense, but why do we need to output the cpu state as part of
/proc/stat? This information should already be available elsewhere.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists