[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150317205555.207b0605@grimm.local.home>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:55:55 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <jingle.chen@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: add trace event for memory-failure
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:47:40 +0800
Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com> wrote:
> I'm not clearly why we need a hard coded here. As the strings or "result" have
> defined in mm/memory-failure.c, so passing "action_name[result]" would be more
> clean and more flexible here?
The TP_printk() is what will be shown in the print format of the event
"format" file, and is what trace-cmd and perf use to parse the data and
know what to print. If you use "action_name[result]" that will be what
the user space tools see, and will have no idea what to do with
"action_name[result]". The hard coded output is a bit more explicit in
how to interpret the raw data.
Another way around this is to create a "plugin" that can be loaded and
will override the TP_printk() parsing.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists